NSFW Content

>>fb-O49UZX3J (OP) I found a paper that says taylor swift gives really good blumpkins and rusty trombones!!!!

>>fb-O49UZX3J (OP) thanks, i'll read it. too bad this site sucks and fchan doesn't let me upload pdfs u_u

>>fb-7MTEL3O1 can always upload to anonfiles or similar, posting link here, would be nice to get without glowing

I can't download it without turning on javascript. Please upload it to a file sharing site so I can download it

Holy fucking retards that can't into scihub https://anonfiles.com/ze54Z3oey8 Also, nothing wrong with liking children.

>>fb-O49UZX3J (OP) Looks like a piece of shit paper that argues for censorship and "multistakeholder governance" a la Schwab. what's the tldr?

>>I4X9Z465 >multistakeholder governance It's actually critical of that term. The main point of the paper is that governments and charities should look into blocking child porn sites at lower levels than what it normally looks at. It shows a case where every level of infrastructure except for the highest level was unwilling to remove child pornography reported by some Canadian charity and then the Canadian charity finally convinced 3 top level internet providers to filter the IP address of 3 child porn imageboards ran by the same group of people and those people quit. I am not sure how it is relevant to the OP's post. They mainly describe the financial motives of creating CP sites rather than posting CP on random imageboards.

As usual, it's all a red herring