Basically see the thread https://anonium.net/thread/1b69c1a5191e0d81e75dea1ae6f56131#6e54c7de1b8b4cc29edff9913e35f47d I've considered: - show plain hex - show base64 - turn it into concatenation of words, like BIP39 - show hex, but only the last x digits Which would you prefer and why? Or do you have another idea?
>>fprog-XQJ0RBG6 (OP) normal base64 is good. it works and you can still get cool gets. although maybe hex is better since its easier to see gets that way
>>fprog-XQJ0RBG6 (OP) die retard
>>fb-VQOJCL9H → you can still get dubs with hex tho
>>fprog-XQJ0RBG6 (OP) Why not just number sequentially, starting at 1? in Pleroma we found inspiration in flake[1], a Decentralized, K-Ordered Unique ID Generator as far as translating a hash to another format, well. I think word lists are fun; see this[2] chan-specific take on making hashes sometime. I don't think it was ever used by anyone (maybe BubbleBBS?). [1] https://archive.is/2015.07.08-082503/http://www.boundary.com/blog/2012/01/flake-a-decentralized-k-ordered-unique-id-generator-in-erlang/ [2] http://worrydream.com/tripphrase/
>>fb-VQOJCL9H → just make the last 3 characters always be digits and have the rest be hex, then you can still roll for dubs.
why not make it the hash of the post contents?
>>fprog-0AHN7I9B flakes mentioned in >>fprog-RP4UJWA6 beat a hash of post contents because they are sortable by time
>>fprog-8WKC3VGN make the timestamp part of the value you hash
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
v0.1.1