Let's try to get other chans to connect to our network. Post attempts and results ITT. I'll start: https://leftypol.org/meta/res/14325.html (archived on archive.today)
>>fb-3HAJ6502 (OP) post this on /b/ chodomite also they would have to use a completely different site, they can't just "implement" activitypub. plus they're humorless faggots i would rather not talk to them
>>fg-9WDY3FE8 nvm 2huchan /g/ is following cyberia /b/ for some reason disregard first line
>>fb-3HAJ6502 (OP) Hey lainon, just letting you know I replied there. Let me know your thoughts.
>>fg-9WDY3FE8 >they're humorless faggots i would rather not talk to them make your own instance if you haven't already and block them then
>>fg-9WDY3FE8 >they would have to use a completely different site, they can't just "implement" activitypub I'm pretty sure they can. One of their devs seems to think so anyway (check the thread on there) >However, if the ActivityPub server can be just an extension of vichan that federates, it could probably work (although it would be some effort to create that extension). I'm not familiar with it, but I know vichan has experimental NNTFChan code (https://github.com/majestrate/nntpchan) for a different protocol, which means there might be a base to work from, updating that to federate posts via ActivityPub. Why exactly do you think it won't work?
>>fb-SCV9YKLL I did. And I'm not really a lainon btw. I just picked this instance because it seemed obscure (decentralisation) and I liked the name.
>>fg-ZZHN6EC8 penis
>>fb-32B2LO86 unless you're the admin you need to choke on my dick and perish stupid faggot
>>fb-LFPMZBOI idk, its just not meant to be that way. by design it'd be a pain. dunno though maybe it could work. i saw the thread and the jannies banned me so yea
>>fg-BQQ8WO6F *the* admin? what do you mean """the""" admin? don't you know that you are on a federated board, my nigga?
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
v0.1.1