>>fg-3489DC4F (OP) What freedom distro do you recommend?

>>fg-934ACAF6 Install Gentoo unironically. That said, nuLinux is compromised and GNU is compromised (they shat on stallman and threw him out). Install NetBSD instead. The paradox is that their cuck license keeps them subversion-frei because companies want to keep the devs productive since they can always just stole their shit, whereas in linuxland, GPL means companies must subvert by inserting trannies everywhere to make sure only they can contribute to the OS and also that their evil additions full of backdoors are passed through as nobody has the skills to realize what''s going on.

>>fg-934ACAF6 Debian (or Trisquel if you're an unironic freetard)

>>fg-844F1D24 Openbsd better

test

>>fg-9C1524BB It's the worst by far unironically. https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/openbsd.html

>>fg-82F63G90 I agree with Debian. People say muh outdated packages, but it really isn't an issue. And if you wanted you could get updated packages, you just have to go through a few more steps. But that's few and far between.

>>fg-DE6AEF8B That's not even remotely true, it is in fact a massive problem and no amount of sid or worse, testing (which is both older than stable yet more buggy) is going to fix that. Another problem is that if you try to pull just one sid package, you'll be forced to update half the system to sid, and sid is literally less stable than the average arch install. The concern over old packages won't matter to you if all you do is browse facebook on your boomerbox, but if you're a developer or rely on modern tech for some task, you're fucked.

>>fg-3884EF52 And that's why devs use fedora or Ubuntu. Debian is a server OS.

>>fg-3489DC4F (OP) I already use gentoo, thank you

NSFW Content

GPL is a disease

>>fg-G6CF6608 Yes and that is a good thing

>>fg-1619CB1E Pretty much. In particular, debian is (was, they changed since systemd/deb's death) really good at keeping the same bugs around for a long time while still backporting security patches. This is garbage for any system not a server (who wants buggy yet old software?), but a boon for a server environment since you can develop your own patches for your own workload and never have to worry about them no longer working if you update. >>fg-G6CF6608 >>fg-9F50D953 There's actually good discussion to be had on the subject: for example, it appears that although the BSD license is cucked, it also gives no incentive to 3rd parties to infiltrate it and take it over, whereas the GPL license's nature, while it protects real freedoms, also encourages unscrupulous big tech to steal it by completely corrupting leadership. In the end, the BSD licensed software remains free, but only because it is easier to exploit and does nothing to protect freedoms. But is it really a bad end result, compared to the alternative?

>>fg-3489DC4F (OP) already did

>>fg-3489DC4F (OP) GNU/ChinkPlague

I hate yellow people.

>>fg-PH4J9AX9 yellow people are the only people

based and GNU pilled

>>fg-3489DC4F (OP) GNU is for twinks and I am right about it.

>>fg-92EEG269 nigga you really think netbsd is going to be even remotely better? i mean those faggots don't have half the mitigations that openbsd and hardenedbsd have and also include linux_compat, making them vulnerable to LINUX vulnerabilities. they're main purpose is running on toasters, its a joke. openbsd is still the best for security and its overall just neat

>>fg-G6CF6608 based