https://github.com/oduwsdl/ipwb This looks cool. A shame the index isn't stored on IPFS though. If it was, it would be a censorship-resistent alternative to web.archive.org
This is pretty cool
Why haven't tripcodes been updated since the early days of imageboards? Insecure tripcodes are, as the name suggests, insecure and secure tripcodes don't work cross-site (which is essential for a federated network like this one is supposed to be). I propose using public-private keypairs as tripcodes. You can do this already by pasting the output of GPG into the post field, but it would be more convenient if a browser extension or client-side JS did everything automatically.
To avoid walls of text, the signature and public key should be hidden from the user by default.
Maybe WebAuthN could be used.
>>3UQ5XP37 (OP) ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
>newgen tripfaggotry nah just do it like me develop such an unique and retarded writing style that ppl can spot it from miles away no bloatware necessary
I created a hygienic macro called `fork` that creates a lambda function which chains comparison functions together like this. (fork number? and integer?) -> (lambda (x) (and (number? x) (integer? x))) Or more generally, (fork check1 connector check2) -> (lambda (x) (connector (check1 x) (check2 x))) It can take variable terms and it has the same behavior so that you can write more complicated definitions. The macro I wrote has the same behavior as (fork check1 connector1 check2 connector2 check3) -> (lambda (x) (connector2 (connector1 (check1 x) (check2 x)) (check3 x))) But it defines more lambda functions than that. Pic related is the actual definition. I am wondering whether or not it's possible to write a hygienic definition of the fork macro that takes any number of arguments, but only defines one lambda function. I want to use syntax-case or define-syntax, No defmacro macros. Also the reason I defined it as a macro instead of a function was because `and` and `or` are macros in scheme so you can't pass them to functions as parameters (at least to my knowledge).
I think I found out a way to do it that only defines the functions once. (define-syntax fork (syntax-rules () ((_ proc1 connector proc2 ) (lambda (x) (connector (proc1 x) (proc2 x)))) ((_ other other* ... proc1 connector proc2 ) (let ((foo (fork proc1 connector proc2))) (fork other other* ... foo )))))
I just realized I can define syntax rules with accumulators after I accidentally made one. Pretty cool. (define-syntax easy-define-symbols (syntax-rules () ((_ () code ...) (begin code ...)) ((_ ( sym syms ...) code ...) (define-multi (syms ...) code ... (define sym (quote sym) )))))
>>0JHUKZ9K Now I want to try making a macro with two recursive calls.
what u worry bout trip codes for you cant even render a gif thumbnail properly morons
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
How the fuck do we revive fchan? Also how do we see the list of instances that this instance federates with?
more fchan instances when? lemmy is now popular, surely some people there will be interested in imageboard culture as well
>>3GZJSGY1 (OP) By hosting another instance, obviously.
>>6QQ1HOD6 you first
Hmm, posts made from thread links on the local overboard have fmain IDs. If that's intentional, no prob - a bit weird though.
>>23NEEX8V one step at a time but indeed, lemmy is fucking exploding
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yB662JQJ_hU Soon we won't be able to tell what's real and what isn't anymore.
idk i already have hyperreality bro u dont come back ever thats how it works
Is it possible to derive a private key from a public key safely if you salt it with a cryptographically random, secret salt which would form part of the private key? If it is, then you can have human-meaningful, secure, decentralised, globally unique identifiers without the need for a blockchain.
>>RA4C02YX I think that's an ecash system but I'm not sure. It does use blind signatures.
test
>>J7W6N5NS Did it work?
>>8R13MVM6 Yes?
Obviously not.
Has any body used forth instead of an operating system in modern times. I have heard of people doing it in the past and have heard that you can do it but I haven't seen anybody actually do it. I know it was one of the first programs ported to x86 but I don't think they used it for a long time.
You may be interested in CollapseOS and the somewhat related DuskOS: >http://collapseos.org/ >https://duskos.org/ They're modern Forth systems, with the first focusing on bootstrapping technology after the collapse of civilization, while the second is for post-collapse, but for when modern computers still exist
>>fg-D7BBA7CB Cool thanks
New thread with hopefully correct post order
>>fb-XMNBC1RI → this is tor
>>fb-HLFLRJWU → seems to be
>>fb-HLFLRJWU →
couple bugs ill have to sort out, post quotes are not showing the in the quoted post.
>>DVNGII5Y (OP)
Fuck pedos, they’re the main reason that crypto anarchy sucks and we can’t have free speech/data absolutism.
Because we are the based race, stupid goy.
>>F88Y8I2N We were chosen because we're based.
>Fuck pedos, they’re the main reason that crypto anarchy sucks and we can’t have free speech/data absolutism. The problem is that your ideology is not conformant with reality.
>>fg-PFJ37RVE (OP) pedos are just the scape goats. The real motivation is information control. When printing press was invented they quickly made rules to censor opinions that were dangerous for moral or state security reasons. Some things just never change
>>DWDR8K1S
Why did they have to make the protocol so entwined with the Lightning Network (shit)? A decentralized* protocol that is married to a network which takes bitcoin and essentially adds reliance on centralized nodes. What compels people to kneecap their own work? Fuck your Bech32 motherfucker!
>>KIYGGGAY (OP) >NO but you can run your own Lighting nodes bro, trust me bro you can be lighting network i swear this is how nostriges think, do not TRUST THEM
>>KIYGGGAY (OP) also I am NOT a homosexual admin, i will forgive you just this once, but in the future please do not disgrace me in such a way...
I used to have a very autistic setup for generating my site, but I rewrote it on hugo and I liked using it. I spent a couple of days reading about it (it has good documentation) and messing around with it, so I will stick with it. My site still has that same boring look, but now that manipulating the layout is easier, I will try to create something that looks decent. I also spend some time surfing the web and reading other people's personal sites, so I have some ideas for how to design mine. Anyway, have you ever used hugo? What do you think of it?
I've come close to using Hugo but I keep using a really autistic and overengineered shellscript setup instead, but it has a slight sentimental value to it so I'll probably keep on using it for now. I am half familiar with how Hugo works and it would probably drastically simplify my website but eh. I also just kinda like the simplicity of lowdown | cat header.html - footer.html | sed whatever, except it's all wrapped up in a simple "make"
>>fg-D425D434 My setup was similar except I used smu as my markdown translator. I used hugo not to simplify, but to automatize things i was previously doing manually, like the pages on the navigation bar and the list of articles on the articles page. I suppose, that counts as simplifying since I don't have to worry about that anymore. Obviously all of this could be implemented on a shell script using find to get a list of files and parsing that to know what to write on each list, but at some point, like you said, it becomes overengineered and you are better off using something written on a real programming language.
Hugo is kinda dumb. It is 10000000000000 times simpler to take a hugo template and just hand code it and maintain/change it by hand. Hugo is the best site generator, but site generators are stupid in general. The markdown is just a stupid fucking thing to learn. Learn markdown in order to make simple html pages. Wait...isn't just learning html easier?? :)
>>fg-C23B84EC >It is 10000000000000 times simpler to take a hugo template and just hand code it and maintain/change it by hand. What. >Wait...isn't just learning html easier?? Do you mean to say that you think handwriting HTML tag soup is better than writing simple markdown and letting the computer doing the shit job of putting everything between <>? If that's the case I'm just gonna go ahead and assume you have never written a website with more than 3 pages.
>>fg-E1F6DCCA I like markdown but sometimes you can't do everything you want to do in it. I haven't tried hugo yet.
This is the start of the new Windows general to discuss everything we love and loath about Microsoft's landmark line of OS :3 From software recommendations, tips/tricks, advice and even the point where Windows made you want to begin your transition. @_@ ^₩^ ×÷× *&* `~'
>>ftech-W02JV9FK (OP) Windows 11 is really good you should try it!!!!!!!
ywnbf
>>ftech-PYF2ZVUW OpenBSD.
sudo rm -rf /*
>>ftech-0UPC4092 (OP) me
>>ftech-0UPC4092 (OP) [fed@cia ~] ~> sudo rm -rf /* bash: sudo: command not found [fed@cia ~] ~>
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
v0.1.1